No Consent No Agreement Section


No Consent No Agreement Section

a r e n n t is p r o m o e o s o s n s i a t o n t. « Displaystyle agreement-promised consideration. » « A » agrees to sell his horse to « B. » « A » was aware that the horse is of an unhealthy mind and did not inform him to « B ». « B, » asked « A, » if he did not deny the fact, « B » would consider the horse to be healthy and « A » remained silent. In this case, the simple silence amounts to the agreement, so that « A » carried out a fraudulent act. If both parties agree to something in the same direction or by the same mutual agreement, the agreement is deemed to have been concluded with approval. « A » a country enters into a contract with « B » another country with an agreement to export for 20 years. But after 10 years, we saw that there was a situation of war, which put an end to all internal exports. In this case, « A » is legally required to terminate the contract with « B. » If there is no free consent, the nullity of the contract depends on the option of the aggrieved party. Ankita agrees to buy a particular cow from Ira, but it turns out that the cow was dead at the time of the bargain, although neither party knows. The agreement is considered invalid. The contract is not valid if there is no free consent or actual approval in accordance with English law.

Consent is not free if it is due to coercion, inappropriate influence, fraud, misrepresentation and error. The contract becomes invalid if there is an error in the cause or cause of the trigger. Error is a vitiating factor, it is by mistake in the consensus and prevent that the meeting of the mind necessary for the conclusion of a contract, It makes a contract not applicable. Thus, in the event of an error, the contract is cancelled, but in other cases such as coercion, undue influence, fraud and misrepresentation, the contract can only be cancelled under Section 19, 19A, consent was not free to the party`s choice. 5. Factual error (section 20): « If both parties to an agreement have an error as to a fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is not concluded. » A party cannot be relieved because it has done a particular act in ignorance of the law. The error can be a bilateral error if both parties to an agreement are wrong. The error must be about an issue that is essential to the agreement.

To put it simply, falsely presented is a misrepresentation rendered innocent, with no intention of deceiving another person.